← Back to Home

Is anoboy.baby Legit or a Scam? Trust Score 10/100

Website: anoboy.baby

Screenshot of anoboy.baby

Safety Score How we score →

10/100
Very High Risk

Strong risk indicators found. We advise against using this site.

Automated checks on October 3, 2026 covered: the captured pages, DNS, certificate and registration data, operator contact details, forms and scripts, threat-intelligence feeds.

First analyzed Mar 22, 2024 · Updated Oct 3, 2026

Think this is wrong? Dispute this verdict — free.

Why this score

  • Strong risk indicators found. We advise against using this site.
  • Automated checks on October 3, 2026 covered: the captured pages, DNS, certificate and registration data, operator contact details, forms and scripts, threat-intelligence feeds.
Final score
10/100
Canonical published score used on the public result page.
Final status
Very High Risk
Published backend status from the canonical read model.
Raw AI score
55/100
Content-review score before canonical guardrails and publication checks.
Confidence
Medium
Confidence attached to the published canonical outcome.
Positive signals
  • CONTACT INFO Email found | Contact email is available: contact.anoboy.baby@gmail.com.
  • SSL VALID Valid SSL certificate | The site has a valid SSL certificate, ensuring secure connections.
Caution signals
  • [REPUTATION] Limited Independent Reputation Signals | Independent traffic and reputation signals were limited.
Evidence summary
Confidence: Medium
Evidence state: Known
Review status: None

AI Analysis Results

Category: Streaming
About this website:

Detailed Analysis Report: Is https://anoboy.baby/ Safe and Legit? Website Overview and Purpose This report is anchored to the visible homepage experience captured during the scrape. The scraped title was Anoboy Baby – Panduan Lengkap Anime Anoboy Terbaru . The visible page appears to serve the following purpose: Content aggregation and information. Visible on-page text referenced Bagi para pecinta anime di Indonesia, telah menjadi salah satu platform yang paling populer untuk menikmati berbagai serial anime favorit secara online. . The content appears aimed at Anime fans. In classification terms, the page aligns most closely with Streaming and Anime characteristics. Content Quality and User Experience Key Experience Highlights The visible landing page itself was captured during the live scrape. The scraped title was Anoboy Baby – Panduan Lengkap Anime Anoboy Terbaru , which gives a direct signal about what the page presents to visitors. The visible page appears to serve the following purpose: Content aggregation and information. The page appears aimed at Anime fans. Supplementary review also reached 2 internal page(s), which helped confirm policy/contact material beyond the first page. Observed transparency on accessible pages: contact signals were present and policy signals were limited . Additional observed context from the analysis included: DOMAIN_AGE 1 year old | Indicates a relatively new site which may raise concerns about longevity and trustworthiness | CONTACT_INFO Email found | Contact email is available: contact.anoboy.baby@gmail.com | SSL_VALID Valid SSL certificate | The site has a valid SSL certificate, ensuring secure connections. Claims Verification and Red Flags Red Flags Detected From a cybercrime and cybersecurity perspective, the visible page content does not, from visible page content alone, show a clear phishing or malware-delivery workflow. Those observed behaviors do not prove fraud by themselves, but they do increase the importance of validating operator identity, payment safety, and account-handling practices before trusting the service. Finding: TRANSPARENCY Missing privacy policy | No privacy policy found on the site. Finding: TRANSPARENCY Missing terms of service | No terms of service found on the site. Caution Points Policy pages were not clearly accessible in this scan; request written terms before any payment or account-linked action. Test the listed support channel with a low-risk question before any irreversible payment or account action. Verify operator identity, ownership trail, and off-site reputation before escalating from browsing to payment, login, or installation. Security Note: SSL is valid (issuer: YR2 ), VirusTotal reports 0/unknown detections, WebRisk status is CLEAN , SPF is configured , and DMARC is missing . Legitimacy and Reputation Assessment Technical and reputation evidence is secondary to the page-content review above, but it still matters. Domain age evidence indicates 1 year(s) based on rdap . Archive continuity suggests archive history looks broadly consistent . Threat-intelligence checks currently show no direct malicious-engine consensus, while WebRisk is CLEAN . Reputation telemetry shows no meaningful Tranco ranking , and visible transparency signals are present for contact details and limited for policy/legal pages. Final Verdict and Recommendations The current result is scam with a trust score of 10/100 . Primary classification from this run: scam with score 10/100 in Streaming (Anime). Conclusion: Overall risk remains in warning territory, so users should require additional proof before trusting critical interactions. Exercise caution when using the site and verify information independently.

Risk Assessment: Very High Risk
⚠️ Red Flags:
  • [REPUTATION] Limited Independent Reputation Signals | Independent traffic and reputation signals were limited.
  • [SECURITY] Email-authentication posture is incomplete (SPF: configured, DMARC: missing)
  • [PRIVACY] Missing Privacy Policy | A privacy policy was not clearly detected on captured pages.
  • [TERMS] Missing Terms & Conditions | Terms and conditions were not clearly detected on captured pages.
📊 Analysis Reasons:
  • DOMAIN_AGE 1 year old | Indicates a relatively new site which may raise concerns about longevity and trustworthiness.
  • CONTACT_INFO Email found | Contact email is available: contact.anoboy.baby@gmail.com.
  • SSL_VALID Valid SSL certificate | The site has a valid SSL certificate, ensuring secure connections.
  • SUSPICIOUS_SCRIPT Potential credential/session exfiltration | Detected a high-severity risk related to credential/session exfiltration.
🏢 Brand Evidence:
  • Contact email matches the site domain.
  • Title references Anoboy Baby
  • Anoboy Baby appears repeatedly in visible page text (23 mentions)
  • Page links repeatedly to expected brand domain anoboy.baby

What we could not check

  • Email authentication (SPF/DMARC): not published

Frequently asked questions about anoboy.baby

Is anoboy.baby a scam?

ScamMinder's automated checks on October 3, 2026 rated anoboy.baby Very High Risk, 10/100. They did not establish a scam. We advise against using this site.

Is anoboy.baby safe?

ScamMinder rated anoboy.baby Very High Risk, 10/100, on October 3, 2026. Strong risk indicators found. We advise against using this site.

What is the trust score of anoboy.baby?

anoboy.baby has a ScamMinder trust score of 10/100 (Very High Risk) from automated checks on October 3, 2026. The score is a trust index built from the evidence we could observe, not a probability.

Verdict history

  • — High Risk (automated reanalysis)

Domain timeline

Dated facts about this domain, each with its source. The timeline is not part of the score.

Feb 2024Months with at least one Wayback Machine snapshotMar 2026

  1. — First Wayback Machine snapshot (18 months with at least one snapshot) · Internet Archive Wayback Machine
  2. — Last Wayback Machine snapshot before the longest gap (No snapshot for the next 5 months) · Internet Archive Wayback Machine
  3. — Wayback Machine snapshots resume · Internet Archive Wayback Machine
  4. — Latest Wayback Machine snapshot · Internet Archive Wayback Machine
  5. — Analysed by ScamMinder (automated reanalysis) · ScamMinder analyses

Sources: Snapshot dates: Internet Archive Wayback Machine; ScamMinder analyses.

Technical Details

Domain Age: 1 year (516 days)
Web archive history: 2 years of Wayback captures
TLS Certificate: Valid · issued by YR2 (DV) · expires in 53 days
Hosting: AS48254 20i Limited (GB)

IP address data powered by IPinfo

Email authentication: SPF present · DMARC missing