Is irda.ir/Categories/Detail/The_amount_of_fees_paid_by_bank

No specific risk indicator was found, but the evidence is limited. Review the details below.

Automated checks on September 28, 2026 covered: the captured pages, DNS, certificate and registration data, operator contact details, forms and scripts, threat-intelligence feeds.

First analyzed Sep 28, 2026 · Updated Sep 28, 2026

Detailed Analysis Report: Is https://irda.ir/Categories/Detail/The_amount_of_fees_paid_by_banks_providing_electronic_services_20 Safe and Legit? Website Overview and Purpose The analyzed page was the /Categories/Detail/The_amount_of_fees_paid_by_banks_providing_electronic_services_20 path rather than the homepage, so this report is anchored to that specific page experience. The scraped title was مبلغ کارمزد پرداختی بانک صادرات ایران به ازای هر صد هزار ریال تراکنش پرداخت قبض و خرید شارژ | ایردا، مرجع تخصصی آمار ایران . The visible page appears to serve the following purpose: Information and services related to banking fees. Visible on-page text referenced مبلغ کارمزد پرداختی بانک صادرات ایران به ازای هر صد هزار ریال تراکنش پرداخت قبض و خرید شارژ | ایردا، مرجع تخصصی آمار ایران EN ورود ثبت نام پایگاه داده (current) سایر خدمات آمار سفارشی بانک اطلاعات صنایع و اصناف تحلیل داد. . The content appears aimed at Banking institutions and financial service providers. In classification terms, the page aligns most closely with Government and Financial Services characteristics. Content Quality and User Experience Key Experience Highlights The requested page path /Categories/Detail/The_amount_of_fees_paid_by_banks_providing_electronic_services_20 was preserved during scraping, so this review reflects that specific page rather than a generic homepage substitute. The scraped title was مبلغ کارمزد پرداختی بانک صادرات ایران به ازای هر صد هزار ریال تراکنش پرداخت قبض و خرید شارژ | ایردا، مرجع تخصصی آمار ایران , which gives a direct signal about what the page presents to visitors. The visible page appears to serve the following purpose: Information and services related to banking fees. The page appears aimed at Banking institutions and financial service providers. Supplementary review also reached 2 internal page(s), which helped confirm policy/contact material beyond the first page. Observed transparency on accessible pages: contact signals were present and policy signals were limited . Additional observed context from the analysis included: Deterministic phishing signal detected before canonical scoring: typosquatting Atlassian (levenshtein) | SSL certificate is valid and secure | Contact information is available including email and phone numbers. Claims Verification and Red Flags Red Flags Detected From a cybercrime and cybersecurity perspective, the visible page content appears commercially transactional and is trying to move the visitor toward a purchase or service-order flow. Those observed behaviors do not prove fraud by themselves, but they do increase the importance of validating operator identity, payment safety, and account-handling practices before trusting the service. Finding: Obfuscated text in the title and meta description raises concerns about the site s transparency and professionalism. Finding: Missing privacy policy and terms of service may indicate a lack of compliance with standard practices. Caution Points Treat the page as a commercial offer: verify pricing, refund rules, payment handling, and dispute options before paying. Policy pages were not clearly accessible in this scan; request written terms before any payment or account-linked action. Test the listed support channel with a low-risk question before any irreversible payment or account action. Verify operator identity, ownership trail, and off-site reputation before escalating from browsing to payment, login, or installation. Security Note: SSL is valid (issuer: Certum DV TLS G2 R39 CA ), VirusTotal reports 0/unknown detections, WebRisk status is CLEAN , SPF is configured , and DMARC is configured . Legitimacy and Reputation Assessment Technical and reputation evidence is secondary to the page-content review above, but it still matters. Domain age evidence indicates unknown age based on unknown . Archive continuity suggests archive continuity could not be verified in this run . Threat-intelligence checks currently show no direct malicious-engine consensus, while WebRisk is CLEAN . Reputation telemetry shows no meaningful Tranco ranking , and visible transparency signals are present for contact details and limited for policy/legal pages. Final Verdict and Recommendations The current result is safe with a trust score of 70/100 . Primary classification from this run: safe with score 70/100 in Government (Financial Services). Conclusion: Overall risk remains in warning territory, so users should require additional proof before trusting critical interactions. Users should verify the legitimacy of the services offered and exercise caution when providing personal information.

• [CONTENT] The website content appears to be obfuscated and difficult to interpret, raising concerns about clarity and user experience.
• [HARD FACTS] The domain does not have a verified age, which adds uncertainty to its legitimacy.
• [TRANSPARENCY] Contact & Legal Signals Confirmed | Contact and legal signals were confirmed from captured pages.

• Domain "irda.ir" is highly similar to Atlassian (levenshtein)
• The website explicitly claims to be the Iran Data Administration (IRDA) in its content.
• IRDA appears repeatedly in visible page text (11 mentions)
• Content uses ownership/official language

Is irda.ir/Categories/Detail/The_amount_of_fees_paid_by_banks_providing_electronic_services_20 a scam?

ScamMinder's automated checks on September 28, 2026 rated irda.ir/Categories/Detail/The_amount_of_fees_paid_by_banks_providing_electronic_services_20 Some Caution, 70/100. They did not establish a scam. Review the details before relying on it.

Is irda.ir/Categories/Detail/The_amount_of_fees_paid_by_banks_providing_electronic_services_20 safe?

ScamMinder rated irda.ir/Categories/Detail/The_amount_of_fees_paid_by_banks_providing_electronic_services_20 Some Caution, 70/100, on September 28, 2026. No specific risk indicator was found, but the evidence is limited. Review the details below.

What is the trust score of irda.ir/Categories/Detail/The_amount_of_fees_paid_by_banks_providing_electronic_services_20?

irda.ir/Categories/Detail/The_amount_of_fees_paid_by_banks_providing_electronic_services_20 has a ScamMinder trust score of 70/100 (Some Caution) from automated checks on September 28, 2026. The score is a trust index built from the evidence we could observe, not a probability.